Talbot County Watermen's Association

News, events & issues affecting watermen on the Eastern Shore.

Watermen are hardworking, God fearing Christians October 10, 2011

Filed under: WATERMEN — talbotwater @ 6:22 am
Tags: , , ,

Watermen are hardworking, God fearing Christians

  •  

Watermen are hardworking, God fearing Christians

As president of the Chesapeake Bay Commercial Fishermen’s Association, I have become increasingly angered and frustrated by the various news media leaving the general public with such a negative impression of the watermen community. There have been numerous stories involving illegal fishing activities both in print and even as specials on our local television shows.

Unfortunately, some of the facts are true, though at times misleading, and we as an industry are not proud of it. To combat such activity, our industry has supported increased fines and penalties for violators, requested additional funding through our legislators to support the efforts of the NRP and have worked with the Department of Natural Resources in implementing various regulations to limit the opportunity to participate in illegal fishing activities without penalizing the honest fisherman.

 
 

The untold version in most all of these news releases is the fact that the overwhelming majority of all commercial fishermen do not condone any form of illegal fishing activity. As a whole, we are hardworking, God fearing Christians who still say the Pledge of Allegiance, sing the national anthem and are not afraid to use the words “one nation under God” at most all of our public functions. We still embrace traditional values and are patriots of our country.

I will be the first to admit that certainly, we share some of the same problems as other industries, communities and professions, but please do not judge us as a group because of the actions of a few. For the most part, we are family men and women who take pride in our occupation, honor its tradition and cherish our heritage. We care as much or more about the health of the Chesapeake Bay than anyone else and want to see this treasure flourish through eternity for all to enjoy. We want our children to be brought up thinking that their parents were part of an honorable profession and to be proud of what they did for a living and not to be depicted as anything less.

Why doesn’t someone write a good article about our watermen sometime? Why doesn’t someone write an article about how you will never find another group of individuals, despite their differences, give one another the shirt off their backs, money out of their pockets and food off their tables to help someone in need?

This is why I am proud to be a part of, honored to represent and humbled by the friendship of our commercial watermen. Enough is enough.

GIBBY DEAN,

President, Chesapeake Bay Commercial Fishermen’s Association

 

Gill net fishing on the miles March 30, 2011

Filed under: WATERMEN — talbotwater @ 6:16 pm
Tags: , ,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyiv7kIy8Ew

This is a great video on gill netting. take a look!

 

Md. House committee to hear bill to lease oyster sanctuaries February 24, 2011

Filed under: WATERMEN — talbotwater @ 6:33 am
Tags: , , ,

Md. House committee to hear bill to lease oyster sanctuaries

 Wednesday, February 23, 2011 

 By KELLEY L. ALLEN Staff Writer The Star Democrat

ANNAPOLIS The House of Delegates today will hear a bill that would make oyster sanctuaries available for private leasing, a move some say could kill the public oyster fishery.

House Bill 208, which the Department of Natural Resources requested, also would allow lease holders to harvest seed oysters from the state’s natural bars for use on private leases for a period not to exceed one month during closed season. That would take baby oysters out of sanctuaries for use on leased grounds.

The bill comes less than six months after state officials expanded sanctuaries from 9 to 25 percent of available oyster habitat. When Gov. Martin O’Malley touted that plan, he said a lack of harvest pressure in sanctuaries would sustain a dwindling oyster population.

DNR Fisheries Services Director Tom O’Connell said the legislation is compatible with restoration, and would allow leasing in sanctuaries, but not on natural oyster bars.

“This increases the opportunities for an individual who wants to get into aquaculture without compromising restoration,” he said. “More oysters within a sanctuary help filter water and increase reproduction.”

The bill also would allow DNR to alter natural oyster bar charts, many of which are at least 100 years old.

Also of concern is the possibility that the department would take more public bottom as compensation for leased sanctuary space.

State Senators Richard Colburn, R-37-Mid-Shore, and E.J. Pipkin, R-36-Upper Shore, introduced Senate Bill 538 earlier this month, which would prohibit DNR from expanding sanctuaries. A hearing is scheduled for 1 p.m. March 1.

And many object to the harvest of baby oysters from sanctuaries.

“This proposal to grant the lease holders the right to collect seed and shell would amount to state sanctioned theft from industry bottom,” said Marc Castelli, a Chesapeake artist and industry researcher and advocate. “There can be no provision to take seed and shell from public bottom.”

In the past decade, hatchery produced spat, or baby oysters, have gone into Maryland’s part of the Chesapeake Bay, according to a press release from the governor’s office earlier this month.

The state’s now abandoned seed program also replenished oyster grounds funded from a yearly oysterman surcharge, a $1 per bushel oyster tax and from public money.

Because of the use of industry funds for seed or shell in the past six years, DNR officials this week opened three areas in Chester River for harvest. That harvest is limited to 15 bushels per day, with the reserve area open this week only and reverting back to closed March 1.

HB208 also would alter the location restrictions for Aquaculture Enterprise Zones (AEZ), and give riparian owners right of first refusal for certain leases. The AEZ are pre-approved lease areas, and the bill would restrict their location within sanctuaries, including not within 150 feet of a Yates bar.

If passed, HB208 would become effective July 1.

 

Rockfish gill net fishery to reopen February 24, 2011

Filed under: EASTERN SHORE,TALBOT COUNTY,WATERMEN — talbotwater @ 6:29 am
Tags: , ,

Rockfish gill net fishery to reopen

Season open Friday and Monday; DNR head: ‘Certain individuals’ under suspicion in poaching

 Wednesday, February 23, 2011  By JACK SHAUM Staff Writer The Star Democrat

ANNAPOLIS Maryland’s commercial gill net fishery for rockfish, which has been closed since Feb. 4 because of the illegal catching of the fish near Kent Island, will re-open for two days before the end of the month.

At the same time, John Griffin, secretary of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, said “certain individuals” are under suspicion in connection with the poaching, but he wouldn’t elaborate.

Griffin also opened up the possibility that commercial gill net fishing might be phased out if adequate new reforms to the fishery cannot be developed.

On Tuesday, Griffin ordered the fishery be re-opened on Friday, Feb. 25, and Monday, Feb, 28, with all normal harvest restrictions in place. He said Natural Resources Police patrols will be increased and there will be additional personnel on duty at rockfish check-in stations.

“We do not believe that re-opening the fishery for a couple of days here at the end of the month … will likely carry us over the quota for this month,” he said in a conference call with reporters.

Griffin said that even after deducting the 12 tons of rockfish illegally caught in the anchored gill nets, there are still about 200,000 pounds of fish remaining in this month’s statewide quota. Maryland’s commercial gill net quota for February is 354,318 pounds and the state’s annual commercial quota is two million pounds.

“I just concluded that, weighing everything, that re-opening the fishery for a couple of days was the sensible and right thing to do,” he said. The secretary said he acted after consulting with fisheries personnel, NRP and many stakeholders.

More than 12 tons of rockfish caught in illegal anchored, submerged gill nets were found near Kent Island on several occasions beginning Jan. 31. The most recent series of nets were found the afternoon of Feb. 16 in Eastern Bay. No other illegal nets have been found since then, Griffin said.

The nets found Feb. 16 were the result of a tip and contained live rockfish and dead mud shad, indicating the nets had been there for some time, officials said. Because the rockfish were too stressed to return to the wild and probably would not have survived, they were donated to the Our Haven Homeless Shelter on Kent Island.

Since the discovery of the first of the illegal nets, NRP has increased patrols and has also relied on a DNR research vessel with side-scan sonar to help locate nets. Griffin also said investigators have been helped by “credible information” about where anchored gill nets might be located.

No suspects have been named in the poaching and no arrests have been made, but Griffin hinted that investigators are making progress.

“It’s still under active investigation and there are certain individuals that are under particular suspicion, and that’s about all it’s appropriate to say about it,” he said. “We have received through personal conversations … comments from watermen and other fishermen about where nets are located … and we’ve been pursuing those by going out to those locations and seeing what we can find.”

Asked if the “certain individuals” are considered to be people of interest in the investigation, Griffin said, “I suppose that’s one way you can refer to them.”

The reward for information leading to arrests and convictions in the poaching stands at $30,500 from a variety of sources, including two citizens who contributed $8,000 to the award fund on Friday. “We cannot thank them enough for their selfless contribution,” Gov. Martin O’Malley said in a statement.

Griffin said DNR and its stakeholders are discussing the need for reforms in the way the gill net fishery is conducted. He said the stakeholders are being asked to help develop such reforms so that there can be improved enforcement of gill net regulations.

Among other things, officials have determined there isn’t enough accountability at rockfish check-in stations and that they may wind up having to be run by the state. Griffin said the time has come to move to a “different culture” among all fishing groups in terms of being more accountable.

Other reforms could come from changes in regulations and statutes as well as legislation before the General Assembly that calls for greater penalties for illegal fishing.

“And if they don’t work … if we can’t develop a set of what we consider to be effective additional ways to respond to some of the problems we’ve observed, I think we’re going to need to take a look at phasing out gill nets,” the secretary said.

Anyone with information on the poaching should call NRP’s Catch-a-Poacher Hotline at 800-635-6124. Callers may remain anonymous.

 

ES delegation pressures DNR for proof February 22, 2011

Filed under: EASTERN SHORE,NEWS — talbotwater @ 10:52 am
Tags: ,

ES delegation pressures DNR for proof

• Members demand to see orders allowing tracking devices • DNR says Friday fishery remains closed • Reward now tops $30,500

PHOTO BY DANIEL DIVILIO Chesapeake Bay Commercial Fishermen’s Association President Gibby Dean, foreground, speaks Friday with General Assembly members form Maryland’s Eastern Shore like Del. Jay Jacobs, background, about the state’s crackdown on rockfish poachers. February 20, 2011 

ES delegation pressures DNR for proof By DANIEL DIVILIO Staff Writer The Star Democrat

ANNAPOLIS The Eastern Shore delegation to the Maryland General Assembly is demanding answers about why local watermen are coming under fire from state officials.

Leaders of watermen’s associations and a local activist appeared Friday before delegation members to discuss the Department of Natural Resources anti-poaching operations and related bills under consideration by the General Assembly.

In the past month, DNR and the Natural Resources Police found more than 12 tons of rockfish caught illegally in anchor nets off Kent Island and shut down the February gill net season until the extent of such poaching operations on the Bay can be determined.

After a Dorchester County waterman, Dean Price, found devices on his boat last month, he called police. The device was turned over to NRP, and the agencies’ official response has been not to comment on ongoing investigations. NRP and DNR will not confirm whether they placed a tracking device on Price’s boat. Five other Dorchester watermen also found on their boats brackets similar to those holding the device on Price’s boat.

Chesapeake Bay Commercial Fishermen’s Association President Gibby Dean said several watermen’s associations voted against the gill net season’s termination and hope DNR will reverse its decision. Dean said the illegally caught fish should be counted against this month’s quota of 177 tons, which has not been exceeded.

“The decision is now in the Department of Natural Resources’ hands,” he said.

Friday afternoon, well after the meeting concluded, DNR announced “The fishery will remain closed until DNR can determine the extent of illegal nets out on the Bay and the amount of striped bass caught in those nets. Before reopening the season, DNR will make sure the current system for accounting for harvest is sufficient and that reopening does not increase the risk for further poaching.”

Del. Adelaide Eckardt, R-37B-Dorchester, said the delegation wrote a letter to DNR Secretary John Griffin concerning the gill net season and questioning how the illegal catches will affect the quota.

Watermen’s activist and artist Marc Castelli said Price contacted the American Civil Liberties Union after discovering the alleged tracking device on his boat. Castelli said the ACLU is requesting proof that court orders were issued allowing the DNR investigation.

Castelli said he spent four days compiling information about the tracking devices and thinks that investigative protocols were broken. He said Price is being harassed by DNR, including being boarded for using a spotlight on his boat to see in the dark.

“This is symptomatic for many of the people that work on the water,” Castelli said.

Del. Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio, R-37B-Talbot, said the delegation requested copies of the court documents from the governor but has yet to receive them, and Sen. Richard Colburn, R-37-Mid-Shore, said DNR officials will not say from which county’s District Court the orders were obtained.

Del. Michael Smigiel, R-36-Cecil, said he planned Friday to file legislation requiring DNR to obtain court orders before placing any tracking device on a waterman’s boat. Smigiel said finding an illegal net is not probable cause to track all fishing boats on the Bay.

“I’d run down to where they sell nets and find out who bought a whole lot of new nets,” he said.

Dean said his association opposes allowing any tracking devices on boats and such measures should be reserved for more violent crimes. He said the association wants funding made available to have more NRP officers patrolling the water.

Sen. James N. Mathias, D-38-Lower Shore, asked if watermen would also be willing to do more self-policing similar to a neighborhood watch group, and Dean said they could.

Del. Jay Jacobs, R-36-Kent, said he opposes a House of Delegates bill regulating fishing gear and plans to introduce a bill expanding the rights for Marylanders to enter the seafood industry. Jacobs said such a law exists only covering four counties including Dorchester and Queen Anne’s and should be extended statewide.

“It looks like a feeding frenzy of legislation against the watermen,” Jacobs said.

Dean asked the delegation to oppose a House bill allowing for the search of boats, homes and vehicles relating to an illegal fishing investigation. He said that is already covered by the U.S. Constitution’s amendment regarding due process and probable cause.

Dean also asked the legislators to beware of any bill proposing a catch share program for the Bay because it could drive independent watermen out of the industry. He said such a program would take the total sustainable catch of blue crabs, for example, and create individual quotas for each waterman.

Castelli said there are many people who are not watermen who want to see the 400-year-old heritage of the state’s seafood industry continue and for the Bay to remain a common fishing ground for everyone, not just large corporations.

“It’s a tradition. It’s a culture here,” Castelli said.

Also Friday afternoon, DNR announced an increase in the reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of poachers responsible for catching 10,000 pounds of rockfish off Bloody Point. According to a press release, two private citizens who wish to remain anonymous added $8,000 to the reward, bringing the total to $30,500.

 

Watermen weigh use of oyster funds February 22, 2011

Watermen weigh use of oyster funds

Have control over certain oyster restoration funds

PHOTO BY BECCA NEWELL Maryland watermen discuss how to use $2.5 million for oyster restoration at a meeting Saturday in Easton.

Posted: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:56 am, Tue Feb 22, 2011.

Watermen weigh use of oyster funds By BECCA NEWELLand KELLEY L. ALLEN Staff Writers The Star Democrat | 0 comments

EASTON Watermen for the first time have control over certain oyster restoration funds, and plan today to submit the industry’s proposal hammered out at a heated meeting Saturday.

Watermen from across the state, along with one representative each from the Department of Natural Resources and Oyster Recovery Partnership (ORP), gathered Saturday morning at the Talbot County Community Center to decide what to do with about $2.5 million in restoration funds.

“This money is considered industry-controlled,” said Talbot County Watermen’s Association President Bunky Chance. “This is the first time we’ve had that much say. This $2.5 million was negotiated by an industry representative to be used just by the industry. In the past, much of that was dictated by the department, which is willing to give up a lot of control.

“We welcome that opportunity.”

Chance said the industry’s proposal is due to DNR today, and includes each county’s ideas for bar restoration. Decisions on seed and shell restoration will come later, Chance said.

“There’s been an ongoing fund available for years for a seed program, but the state focused away from that and focused on aquaculture,” he added. “That’s where we part ways. We feel a seed program is vital to oyster restoration in the Bay, and we plan to revive the seed program.

“The department was good enough to give us wide parameters, to have more say in the management of these funds.”

Saturday’s meeting also saw the formation of a Chesapeake Bay Oyster Industry Committee, a group of industry representatives from each county. That committee will make decisions on oyster restoration that the counties have not made.

“The county decision process stops short of achieving all our goals,” Chance said. “The last few decisions in the circle fall to DNR to make, and it offered us the chance to make them ourselves. The committee won’t handle every decision, just the ones that fall outside of county jurisdiction.”

Coming up with a proposal came after some tension and arguments about whether each county, or a combined group, should determine what to do with the money.

“Today we’ve got a pot right in the middle of the room of $2.5 million… you need to figure out how you want to spend that money,” Chance said at the start of Saturday’s meeting. “I want everybody here to give thought to their own county about moving forward as an organized effort … it’s your goal to get us where we want to go.”

Mark Connolly, a member of Talbot County Watermen’s Association, encouraged attendees to submit their information before the meeting’s end to ensure an efficient restoration program.

Anne Arundel Watermen’s Association member John Rome asked attendees to stop arguing.

“We’ve got to think of this as what’s good for the industry. Let’s get on one train of thought,” he said.

Chance also urged the watermen to organize.

“You guys have the privilege to determine where the money goes … it’s not ORP money, it’s industry money,” he said.

That money come from several sources state capital funds, the Blue Crab Fishery Disaster Fund, and a federal grant, said Stephan Abel, ORP’s executive director. Abel said each year those funds are used to reclaim shell to establish viable oyster bars.

Also included in that $2.5 million is about $800,000 from Maryland Department of Transportation reimbursement for dumping dredge spoils into the Chesapeake Bay, at $1 per cubic yard. The pot also includes special funds, from a $1 per bushel oyster tax and a $300 per year oysterman surcharge.

Of that $2.5 million, the $800,000 in dredge reimbursement will get distributed equally among the water counties, and another $666,000 will come out for seed or shell replenishment. The rest, about $1 million, will go toward oyster bar restoration, Chance said.

The ORP has another $2.2 million for restoration, slotted for sanctuaries and recovery projects, Chance said.

 

Rockfish decision may come Fri. February 17, 2011

Filed under: COMMUNITY,EASTERN SHORE,NEWS — talbotwater @ 2:32 pm
Tags: , , ,

Rockfish decision may come Fri.

State agency weighing whether to reopen season for several days

 Thu Feb 17, 2011.

Rockfish decision may come Fri. By KELLEY L. ALLEN Staff Writer The Star Democrat | 0 comments

TILGHMAN Finding two more tons of illegally caught rockfish Friday shows investigating doesn’t stop illegal poaching, but it does stop honest watermen.

Department of Natural Resources closed the rockfish season Feb. 4 after discovering about 10 tons of the state fish trapped in illegal nets off Kent Island. Since then, Natural Resources Police, the enforcement arm of DNR, have searched local waters for more nets, trying to grasp the extent of poaching before reopening the season that closes Feb. 28.

Last week, NRP found two more tons of rockfish in illegal nets set in an area officers had searched the week before. That indicated the investigation hasn’t stopped poachers, whose actions have hurt those who play by the rules.

“There’s a lot of guys sitting on the shore wishing they never got into the rockfish business,” said Talbot County Watermen Association President Bunky Chance. “There’s a lot of good men wondering how to put food on their table because of all this.”

All this is more than 25,000 pounds of poached rockfish found in about two weeks in local waters, snagged in a total of 8,000 yards of illegal gill nets.

So far this week, officers have come up empty handed, with the last nets found Friday, and a decision onre-opening the season could come Friday, said DNR Fisheries Service Director Tom O’Connell.

If the season opens, it would likely open for one to three days, he added.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty about how much illegal activity has occurred,” O’Connell said. “It’s a matter of how confident we are there’s still quota to be caught.”

The migratory fish is caught on a quota basis, with 354,000 pounds allotted for February, a month that allows rockfishing on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Fishermen caught all but 80,000 pounds of the first half of the month’s 210,000 pound quota in the first two days of the season, at an average of about 70,000 pounds per day, O’Connell said.

There is 120,000 pounds set aside for the latter part of the month. That, plus the remaining 80,000 pounds leftover from the beginning, leaves about 200,000 pounds.

Each permitted fisherman, of which the state has 1,231, including about 600 gill net fishermen of which about 200 are active, can catch 300 pounds per day.

“We recognize some fishermen haven’t had access to the fish yet, and we don’t want to disadvantage them,” O’Connell said. “We’re trying to figure out what’s the best decision.”

DNR officials met Tuesday with recreational fishermen representatives, and plan to meet Thursday night with the Tidal Fisheries Advisory Commission, which helps set and manage quotas.

Those meetings could provide enough information for a decision this week, and if that happens, the season would open next week after a 48-hour public notification period.

“But it could be we can’t and we’ll try to do it as early as possible,” O’Connell said. “We’re taking this seriously. This is the first time we’ve shut down the season.”

In the meantime, this latest hardship from what could become the watermen Diaspora has cast a negative pall on the industry.

“I would hope the public wouldn’t condemn the 99 percent honest watermen who make a living to feed their families and not associate us with those who break the law … it’s a select few,” Chance said.

With lots of tips but no arrests, NRP continues investigating, and Sgt. Art Windemuth answered questions Wednesday while out on the water, trolling for nets.

Windemuth said last week most watermen are law-abiding conservationists, and NRP needs their help catching poachers.

“They are concerned with the resource and do things the way they should,” he said. “Watermen are in the front lines of conservation … we fully recognize that. It does infuriate them we’ve heard from them. … this affects them directly. That’s why we ask for the public and the watermen’s help.”

Watermen can use drift nets to catch rockfish, which allow up to 20 pounds of weight on each end. Those nets must drift with currents like a blanket, and watermen have to keep them in sight.

Anchor nets, on the other hand, require hundreds of pounds of weight, said Windemuth. The gear for both legal and illegal nets look the same, except for the weights.

Most watermen obeyed a 1985 law that outlawed anchored nets, but a few continued with the tradition.

“The public isn’t aware this is portrayed as crazy, illegal gear,” Chance said. “Up until years ago anchor nets are what everybody used. You went out, put them out, and came back the next day. That’s how we did business for generations.

“A handful stayed with the old ways.”

And for the few who poach, the financial rewards outweigh the risk. Windemuth estimated the commercial value of the initial 10-ton find at $60,000.

“That’s for two days of work,” he said.

Chance said it takes about 10 minutes to set a net, and if NRP finds a net, all the poacher loses is gear, worth maybe a few thousand dollars.

“If they caught $10,000 to $30,000 worth of fish, it doesn’t take many successful nets to make it very worthwhile,” he said.

Buying illegally caught fish also is worthwhile, but penalties are steep.

“They caught one (illegal buyer) on the western shore and he is in federal prison,” Chance said. “But they (poachers) could be putting fish in their truck and hauling it out-of-state where laws are different.”

Updates on rockfish harvest are available at 1-800-999-2800, and the 24-hour catch a poacher hotline is 1-800-635-6124.

 

State Lawmaker Introduces New Poaching Law February 9, 2011

Filed under: COMMUNITY,EASTERN SHORE,NEWS,WATERMEN — talbotwater @ 5:06 am
Tags: , , , ,

Reported by Brian Spyros WBOC 16

ANNAPOLIS, Md.- Maryland state lawmakers are joining the fight when it comes to stopping oyster poaching in the Chesapeake Bay.

A Western Shore senator introduced Senate Bill 159 to the Senate Education, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee in Annapolis. The bill is calling for poachers to lose their fishing license if they are caught harvesting oysters in an area that is off limits or designated as a sanctuary.

“It’s a bill that simply says oysters are too important and they need to stay in place,” said Kim Coble of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

Right now many poachers are fined when they are caught. Officials say the fines do not serve as a deterrent since many look at the fines as the price they have to pay in order to do business.

Some state officials are concerned that poachers will not be caught due to the limited manpower of the Natural Resources Police.

 

Questions Remain After Devices Found on Boats February 2, 2011

Filed under: COMMUNITY,EASTERN SHORE,NEWS,WATERMEN — talbotwater @ 7:50 am
Tags: , , ,
Reported by Brian Spyros WBOC Channnel 16 news
Questions Remain After Devices Found on Boats

ANNAPOLIS, Md.- Several watermen in Dorchester County say they have many questions, but no answers after devices were found under the stern of their boats.

Dean Price, a waterman at Madison Bay Marina, said that on Jan. 14 he found a bracket hidden on his boat. Attached to that bracket were two devices, including one with an antenna.

“I’ve never seen anything like it,” Price said.

Price then called 911, not knowing if the device was a bomb. According to reports, Maryland State Police and the Dorchester County Sheriff’s Office arrived on the scene. Maryland Natural Resources Police Sgt. Randy Bowman also arrived on the scene. People who were on the scene tell WBOC that Bowman then told police they could leave the scene.

A bomb technician was brought in and the device was removed and turned over to the Department of Natural Resources.

Several other watermen reported finding brackets on their boat as well, but no devices were attached. Watermen say they want to know who put the devices on their boats and why.

“I’ve gotten nowhere with the Department of Natural Resources, from anyone. I don’t have any answers,” Price said.

WBOC contacted DNR for comment on the matter and was referred to Natural Resources Police Sgt. Art Windemuth, who said, ”This is an ongoing investigation and we do not comment on ongoing investigations.”

 

Talbot County Waterman’s Association Position on Maryland’s current Oyster Management Plan. November 29, 2010

 

The Talbot County Waterman’s Association (TCWA) does not believe the current Oyster Management Plan adopted

by the State of Maryland will work. Recently there has been over 9100 acres of productive oyster bottom

taken out of production and set aside for sanctuaries. By the DNR’s own admission, sanctuaries have not proven

to be successful in the past. Even after funding shell and seed for these areas, the sanctuaries have the appearance

of a harvested bar within a few years. They want to promote disease resistance through natural selection,

an unproven process that can take decades. Also, sedimentation is a problem because it decreases the chances of

propagation through normal spat reproductive methods. Funding will also be needed to clean these sanctuaries.

The huge cost associated with maintaining these sanctuaries and funding is not presently available.

A recommitment to the Oyster Seed Repletion Program (Seed Program) and increased power dredging offers a

more cost effective, proven process to increase oyster populations. The Seed Program was started in the 1960’s

and has a documented track record. Delaware, Virginia and New Jersey have emulated Maryland’s seed repletion

program, resulting in a substantial increase in their overall oyster population.

Now, with the decrease in prevalence of these diseases, we believe that the Seed Program is once again an appropriate

avenue to pursue using the disease resistant strain of oysters naturally occurring in the lower Bay to

increase the density of oysters on our oyster bars. Power dredging has also proven to be an effective method to

harvest oysters while clearing sediment and increasing shell surface on the bars and enhancing natural oyster

spat recruitment. We have witnessed this success on the lower Eastern Shore with increased oyster harvests in

the last 3 years:

• 101,000 bushels in 2007-2008

• 115,000 bushels in 2008-2009

• 180,000 bushels in 2009-2010

With the reinstatement of the Seed Program and expansion of oyster dredging, a disease resistant oyster can be

spread throughout the Bay while reducing sedimentation and increasing shell replenishment. This can be accomplished

at a very reasonable cost – one that will be much more cost effective than the State’s new program

which is scienti

fi cally unproven.In conclusion, TCWA believes that the State has introduced a plan that not only is unaffordable, but will not

increase oysters in the Bay. The aquaculture portion of Maryland DNR’s oyster initiative is not contested by

the watermen. Sediment and disease have wreaked havoc on attempts to successfully create pro

fi t from leasedbottom in the past. Some success has been attained by raising the oysters off the bottom, though for most watermen,

this is an expensive proposition and unaffordable. In the current economic times, borrowing money for

what is at best a chancy proposition with no solid promise of success, is inadvisable and not a solution for your

average waterman. Reinstatement of the Oyster Seed Repletion Program and expansion of power dredging will

hasten natural disease resistance and accelerate the growth of oysters in the Bay while preserving Maryland’s

heritage and the waterman’s way of life.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers